random reviews, recollections & reminiscings

Monday, December 31, 2007

DVD REVIEW: Live Free or Die Hard: 2-Disc Unrated Edition (2007) ***

diehard4





2 hr. 10 min.

written by: Mark Bomback & David Marconi (source material from John Carlin's magazine article A Farewell to Arms as well as characters created by author Roderick Thorpe)
produced by: Michael Fottrell
directed by: Len Wiseman


As soon as I found out that this movie was gonna be released on DVD in an "unrated" edition, I knew I could hold off seein' it in the theaters. It's not that I craved more profanity or violence, it's just that all the other Die Hard movies were rated R and it isn't the same without those elements that kinda rating brings. It saddened me that director Len Wiseman was willing to "dumb down" the consistency of this film series in order to possible garner more PG-13 money. Didn't they realize that if fans see another Die Hard movie coming out, they're not gonna pay attention to what the rating is? They're just gonna want nostalgic familiarity and action. The only reason I paid attention to this rating was cuz it's been twelve years since the last one and everything about this new one would be scrutinized to ensure that the quality, consistency (there's that word again) and characterization in this new film would be intact.

Taking that into consideration, this is a fun, over-the-top action movie. I'd kick up my feet and watch it again with some friends on a Friday night. Still, It just doesn't feel like a Die Hard movie and before I go into the reasons why, I'll just go ahead and give you the rundown. The film opens up with a handful of cyber-geek hackers being eliminated after they unknowingly assisted the requisite bad guy infiltrate the FBI's computer system. The killings are untraceable since once these hackers delete a message from our bad guy they explode into fiery oblivion along with everything else around them. Around the same time, the wee hours of the morning, the FBI found out something is up and ask that local police follow up on and any and all hackers that could possibly be doing this.



Bruce Willis as John McClane in 20th Century Fox's Live Free or Die Hard



Computer geek Matthew Harrell (Justin Long) fits this description and it falls to the responsibility of a certain veteran NYPD detective named John McClane (Bruce Willis) to pay him a visit at his apartment somewhere in Jersey. It's here where we become re-introduced to the iconic character that ignited Willis' career and I'm gonna have to get into that re-introduction a lil later. Right away I enjoyed the interplay between analog McClane and digital Harrell. I saw where it was going and has ready for their pairing to bring me all sorts of action, mayhem and hilarity throughout the film. McClane winds up saving the kid from permanent deletion when the foreign-accented bad guys attack his apartment and from that point on the two are on the run from terrorists, naturally.

Along the way, the father and son-like duo run into some requisite supporting characters. Some of these are on the good guys team like Special Agent Bowman (the always great Cliff Curtis), McClane's daughter Lucy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) and the distracting presence of actor/director Kevin Smith as a computer guru names Warlock. The odd thing I found with many of the bad guy lackeys is that they were Italian (say what? Italian terrorists?) with no explanation as to how they hooked up with this American bad guy. On that note, it woulda been nice to see this guy switch roles with his right-hand woman, Mai (Maggie Q) who at least had a formidable presence. Plus, it woulda been refreshing for a woman to be the villain in a movie like this. Ah well.

So, the main bag guy is a ruthless computer whiz named Thomas Gabriel (Timothy Olyphant) has taken over most of America's computerized systems, causing mass chaos nationwide. Harrell has to break that all down for McClane as they witness various traffic and power calamity on the way to DC's FBI branch. The premise is absolutely preposterous, but that's never really been a problem for "Die Hard" before and might even honestly be considered one of the series' hallmarks. That being said, it's still the least plausible of any of the "Die Hard" stories so far, and that even includes terrorists taking over an airport in "Die Hard 2: Die Harder".

This is the first Die Hard film where McClane doesn't buddy up with an African American, instead we're given a generation gap to keep things interesting. Willis and Long manage to establish a fairly amusing rapport early on, and it's this dynamic that keeps things rolling through a few rough patches. Anyone knows that a great action movie must always be measured by the threat....or how "bad" is the bad guy. This is where the film goes limp. Olyphant is just miscast. He just comes across as a crybaby who didn't get what he wanted and is lashing back at "the system" like a wounded dog by using "the system". His evil intentions weren't convincing and were basically MIA for most of the film. But siding with or understanding the villain isn't what this entertaining action flick is about.



Bruce Willis as John McClane in 20th Century Fox's Live Free or Die Hard

My biggest problem is that re-introduction I mentioned, he just doesn't look like the John McClane we know. I know, it seems picky but it's kinda integral if you ask me. McClane's saved his head bald, is totally serious and is lean and trim. There's no explanation as to what became of the endearing, frazzle-haired wino that was peeled off the floor 12 years ago in the beginning of the last film. So, instead we're treated to a slim and fit, head-shaven Bruce Willis. I say that cuz that's all I saw. I saw Willis and not McClane. Not that I didn't enjoy seeing Willis run around in this film but he didn't look like John McClane and with the movie not explaining what had happened to him in 12 years. It's just a lil jarring for my continuity-conscious mind.

It's obvious that action films must adapt due to "our changing times" but I just feel like the whole "computer hacker" bit has been done to death over the years. I imagine it's hard to find a good script for a McClane movie cuz viewers are inundated with all these tech-savvy Jack Bauer types. It felt like this time around McClane was this unstoppable supercop and that's why I'm fine with it as a Bruce Willis film. You can't tell me that McClane wouldn't have had several broken bones, a punctured lung and some severe burns. Then again this is a summer blockbuster movie so the believability factor thrown out threw the windshield.

The action is expectantly brisk and non-stop: baddies are dispatched violently, car chases come fast and furious and explosions abound. McClane has almost become a caricature of the tough, wisecracking cop we first met in 1988---and there are still traces of mortality at times, but the danger doesn't feel quite as dangerous anymore. We could almost substitute Jack Bauer himself in John McClane's role---and let's be honest, it really wouldn't change much. It would been cool if the setting of the film went back to Christmas time like in the first two but I can't have everything. Still, there's a lot to like here: from the stylishly shot action sequences to the razor-sharp editing and effective comic relief....for a Bruce Willis action film. It just doesn't feel like a Die Hard film and once I acknowledged that, I enjoyed it and hey....what it lacks in believability it makes up for in action.








intldiehard4poster


Special Features:


This unrated, two-disc package gives fans what they should've gotten at the theater: more profanity and blood (what can I say? It keeps with continuity) Interestingly enough, both cuts are included on Disc 1, which leads me to think, if you're given the better version, why would you opt for the watered-down? The story in this uncut version hasn't changed one bit, but it's good to know that such an lame marketing decision has been reversed for the DVD release. Thing is, I knew it would cuz the latest fad is to release a movie in an "unrated and uncut" version to draw in more numbers.

There's a ton of good features here and some that are kinda weak, all of which have a solid technical presentation. As usual, I didn't devour them all but I'll list them out for ya and comment on what I did take in.


The only extra on Disc 1 is a feature-length Audio Commentary with star Willis, director Len Wiseman and editor Nicholas de Toth. I didn't re-watch the film with this commentary but I wouldn't mind doing so, if the copy I had wasn't borrowed from a co-worker I woulda made time for it and the other extras.

On Disc 2, the longest feature is entitled "Analog Hero in a Digital World: The Making of Live Free or Die Hard" This documentary is a fairly detailed promotional nugget, covering the story origins, franchise history, casting, stunts, editing, visual effects, sound mixing and music...everything is covered here. Because "Analog Hero" covers so much, I did wind up skimming through it. It was indepth and insightful but a lot of ground to cover.
Then there's the "Yippee Ki Yay MotherF*****!" feature, a casual chat with co-star Kevin Smith and Willis, who discuss the star's career while simply hanging out on the Fox lot. It's just the two of them sitting on the steps if the set. Willis looks like a Hobbit next to Smith. It's a laid-back interview that doesn't include a much brand-new information, but the candid atmosphere really stands in good contrast to everything else. It was interesting to see what Willis thinks of his previous two sequels. While I liked them both, apparently he feels this film is the superior to those two....how wrong you are, Mr. Willis. Obverall, this interview seems as pretentious and uneccessary as Smith's inclusion in the film.
I didn't bother with the next three extras: first up is a Music Video for the film by Guyz Nite, which I actually did scan out of curiosity. I didn't know if the guys in this band were for real or what. After all, I didn't remember any song that stood out as I watched things blow up in the movie. From what little I caught, it's a stupid song with the gratuitous inclusion of the trademark Willis catchphrase in rowdy rock fashion. Accompanying the insipid music video is "Behind-the-Scenes with Guyz Nite", which will probably only be of interest to fans of the band (you know who you are).
The final feature I did see was the boring "Fox Movie Channel Presents: Fox Legacy", a brief, promotional-type recap of the franchise which doesn't really add much but it did ceack me up when the host described why the movie is called "Die Hard 4.0" (see above) to non-U.S. theatres. Sigh.
Of couse, there's the Theatrical Trailer, as well as a few Previews for current and upcoming Fox releases. Not all of these minor features fit in with the main "Analog Hero" one and it's too bad cuz I woulda preferred some focus on storyboards. They could even included some deleted scenes or man, at least a gag reel. Oh well.
Bruce Willis and
 director Len Wiseman set up a scene for 20th Century Fox's Live Free or Die Hard
The Skinny:
  • While in early development with a script that was eventually discarded, the movie had been given the subtitle "Tears of the Sun". Willis told the studio he would commit to a Die Hard 4 if he could use the title for Tears of the Sun (2003).
  • The French title translates as "Die Hard 4.0: Return to Hell".
  • Prints were sent out to UK cinemas under the fake name "New Hampshire" - a reference to the state's "Live Free or Die" motto and the movie's original title - in spite of the title being changed to "Die Hard 4.0" in European territories.
  • This film addresses the apparent continuity error in earlier installments - McClane is afraid of flying in the first two films, but not the third. Here, he explains that he took flying lessons in order to face his fears.
  • Jessica Simpson auditioned unsuccessfully for the role of Willis' daughter. She can be seen on the way to the audition and coming out of the audition in "Newlyweds: Nick & Jessica" Mismatched Threesome (2004)_ .
  • The movie's title, "Live Free or Die Hard", is a reference to New Hampshire's State Motto "Live Free or Die". Consequently, the New Hampshire state film office received several phone calls asking where in the state the movie was filmed.
  • Justin Timberlake was in talks to play McClane's son.
  • According to Willis and Director Wiseman in the DVD Commentary, the story originally involved McClane's son, Jack. Originally, he was supposed to be the computer hacker John has to deliver to the FBI. Eventually that idea was dropped and the hacker became the Matt Ferrell character. It was then decided to bring in his daughter Lucy to keep up the series continuity of McLane always having a personal stake in what happens in the story.
  • When filming the scenes of John walking through the corridors talking to Gabriel on the two-way, there were no written lines of dialog for Willis, according to Wiseman on the DVD Commentary. So what they did on set was have Willis hold the two-way up to his mouth and speak gibberish so it looks like he's talking to Gabriel. If you'll notice, there are a couple of times where the two-way isn't all the way up to Willis's face and you can see his mouth doesn't match the dialog being spoken.
  • In the elevator shaft scene where Mai Lihn swings on the wire and flies into the truck and hits McClane, the stunt double accidentally cut Willis's eyebrow with her spiked heel and according to Wiseman in the DVD Commentary, she jabbed Willis hard enough that when medics examined the injury, the brow bone was exposed.
  • The film was edited down to a PG-13 rating for commercial reasons, thus making it the first film in the series not rated R.
  • In the beginning credits when Kevin Smith's name comes on the screen. The "m" in smith disappears and you see "Sith" for a few seconds paying homage to Kevin Smith's love of all things 'Star Wars' which also reflects in his character in the movie.
  • When introduced to an agent Johnson, McClane says: "Johnson, again?". A nod to the two agents Johnson in Die Hard (1988), despite the fact that McClane and the two agents Johnson never spoke to each other or met face to face.
  • In the beginning of the film, John McClane and Lucy have an argument that eventually leads to them discussing her use of her mother's last name, Gennero. This was also a discussion in the first Die Hard (1988) film, as seen when John McClane is searching for the location of his wife, Holly, in the Nakatomi building. He does not find her under Holly McClane, but does find her under her maiden name Gennero.
  • The Terminator action figure in Matt's apartment is a nod to executive producer William Wisher Jr. and composer Marco Beltrami. Wisher co-wrote and appeared in The Terminator (1984) and Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991), and Beltrami composed the score for Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003).
  • The first film in the Die Hard series not to be shot in the anamorphic Panavision process. This film was shot with 3-Perf Super35 process to save money with visual effects.
  • When McClane is driving in Jersey and talking to the chief captain of Camden, the guy's name is Wiseman, same name as the director, Wiseman.
  • The screen to the far left of all of Warlock's hacking screens has the auction website eBay open with a Boba Fett action figure being watched.
  • In addition to the 'Agent Johnson' reference, several other elements from the first film are revisited as series trademarks. Among them are: crawling on broken glass, use of air-ducts, elevator shafts, and maintenance areas in corporate buildings, a henchman falling down stairs, an inquiry on the E.T.A. of a helicopter, and McClane's "Yippie Ki Yay' catchphrase.
  • When Gabriel is talking to McClane over the phone and pulling up his information on the computer, Bonnie Bedelia makes a cameo appearance in the form of her character Holly McClane's driver's license photo. The photo appears as though it may be either a publicity shot from a prior "Die Hard" film or a still photo (i.e. family portrait) from one of the movies.
  • All the IP-addresses shown in the movie are legal ones. However, most start with either 10, 172.16 or 192.168. Those numbers are reserved for local traffic only. Matt transfers the data with scp to 202.218.154.52, which is owned by a Japanese company.
  • On the traffic monitoring screens showing the created traffic jam ups, some reused footage (armored car turning) from the The Italian Job (2003) can be seen.
  • The bad guy, Thomas Gabriel points a gun at McClane and declares "On your tombstone it will say 'Always in the wrong place at the wrong time'." 'John McClane is back in the wrong place at the wrong time!' was a tagline used for Die Hard 2 (1990).
  • The video game Gears of War (2006) (VG) for the Xbox 360 is featured twice in the film: on televisions in the first hacker's apartment and in the Warlock's basement.
  • The name "Tovarek", which Mai Lihn uses as an FBI agent, is a Polish word and one of it meanings is "hot chick" (the correct Polish word is "towarek", but it's pronounced like this).
  • The car that is stolen in the film by McClane and Farrell is a 2006 E60 BMW 5 series, which was chosen due to a poll that found that people wanted films that had more BMWs in it. The main reason being that the alternatives (Audis and Mercedes-Benzes) were too common and not bold and imposing enough to go with the characters in the film. The particular BMW model (5 series) was chosen because the director, Wiseman, found "the 3 series too common, the 7 series too uptight and every other car either too feminine or compensative for a midlife crisis.... Everything McClane isn't, yet".
  • Filming started in downtown Baltimore, Maryland on September 23, 2006.The Social Security Datacenter exteriors were shot at Diamond Ranch High Schol in California.
  • Eight different sets were built on a large soundstage for filming many scenes throughout the film.
  • In order to prevent possible injuries and be in peak condition for the film, Willis worked out almost daily for several months prior to filming.Willis was injured January 24, 2007 during a fight scene, when he was kicked above his right eye by a stunt double for actress Maggie Q. The injury was regarded as "no big deal" and Willis saw a doctor and went home for the rest of the day.
  • Throughout filming, between 200 and 250 stunt people were used. Willis' stunt double, Larry Rippenkroeger, was knocked unconscious when he fell twenty-five feet from a fire escape to the pavement. Rippenkroeger suffered broken bones in his face, several broken ribs, a punctured lung, and fractures in both wrists. Due to his injuries, production was temporarily shut down. Willis picked up the tab at area hotels for Rippenkroeger's parents and visited him a number of times at the hospital.
  • Larry also doubles for 'James Caan' in his TV series, "Las Vegas" (2003). Caan came and visited Larry in the hospital and joked around for over an hour. Larry told his parents he was glad when Caan left because he hurt so bad laughing at Caan's jokes.



Live Free or Die Hard (2007) Poster

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

DVD REVIEW: Talk to Me (2007) ***1/2

Talk to Me (2007) poster





R for pervasive language and some sexual content.
1 hr. 58 min.

written by: Rick Famuyiwa & Michael Genet
produced by: Joe Fries, Mark R. Gordon, Sidney Kimmel & Josh McLaughlin
directed by: Kasi Lemmons


I first noticed writer and director Kasi Lemmons for her acting work, playing Jodie Foster's fellow FBI trainee/student in Jonathan Demme's "Silence of the Lambs". It wasn't a standout performance but the movie left such an indelible mark that I found myself remembering almost everyone in it. She went on to build a reputable enough filmography as an actress but the next time her name caught my attention was for the 1997 film, "Eve's Bayou", her directorial debut starring Lynn Whitfield and Samuel L. Jackson. A critically lauded film set in 1960's Louisiana about a secret that tears apart a well-to-do family. I didn't see her 2001 follow-up film (also with Jackson) "The Caveman's Valentine" but it's a film that I been meanin' to check out. I'm always interesting in actors turned directors, usually the actors are more recognizable before they make the switch (Kevin Costner & Denzel Washington come to mind). This year, Focus Features released Lemmons' latest film which tells the true story of foul-mouthed, ex-con who became a sensation by just being himself.

Ralph Waldo "Petey" Green (Don Cheadle), a formerly imprisoned hustler would go on to become a voice as a radio show host in the late 1960s. While visiting his brother Milo (Mike Epps) at Lorton prison, radio producer Dewey Hughes (Chiwetel Ejiofor) meets Petey for the first time, not knowing what an indelible mark he would make in his life. Petey asks him straight up for a job at WOL-AM, since he's been flippin' and spinnin' vinyl for the prison inmates. Dewey dismisses the convict, calling him a "low-life, miscreant", promising him he'd see what he could do, should the convict ever get out of prison. Of course we know where this is going, Petey does indeed "look up" Dewey and winds up hounding him for a DJ job with a ferocious tenacity. He soon shows up at the station, demanding a job, embarrassing straight-laced Dewey and laying the groundwork for a tumultuous relationship between the two men.

Eventually Dewey gives in, much to his dismay and in time Petey becomes a huge hit with the black community, who are taken with his tell-it-like-it-is persona. Station owner E.G. Sonderling (Martin Sheen) has no idea what to make of Petey, but he loves the fact that the station's ratings are up. His success doesn't sit well with the other DJ's, Sunny Jim (Curtis Hondie Hall) or The Nighthawk (Cedric the Entertainer) but once Petey takes to the air to calm the violence that hits DC after the sudden announcement of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. he gains just about everyone's respect and even more intense fan-following. They love him because he's one of them and doesn't hold anything back while the station heads love him cuz of the ratings and flood of calls.

Don Cheadle in Focus Features' Talk to Me
He continues to tout himself as the voice of the people, urging callers, "Talk to me" as they call in to the station to commiserate and confide. With Dewey behind him as a guiding force, Petey eventually gets his own television show, which is more outrageous than his radio program. But, alas, with popularity and good fortune come many vices and temptations like booze and babes, which threaten Petey's career as well as his long-term relationship with girlfriend Vernell (Taraji P. Henson), But it's his friendship and partnership with Dewey that feels the most strain.
It's not until Dewey tries to make Petey out to be a comic sensation instead of the fast-talkin' commentator that he is that they both hit rock-bottom. It's their relationship that drives the film as it becomes a complex and fascinating character study. Petey represents a brash flamboyance and reckless disregard for the rules of society that Dewey longs to express, whereas Dewey possesses ambition and inner strength that Petey lacks. The two men balance each other out, creating a fantastic dynamic that is driven by the excellent chemistry between Cheadle and Ejiofor.

This all could've gone the wrong way and I give credit to the writers and Lemmons for delivering something genuine and real. Of course Cheadle is an amazing actor and he certainly shines here but he really is working from a great script. So often, biopics go wrong, often degenerating into sentimental slop that includes the classic rise and fall of any star. It can really just make a real person's life look like a series of ridiculous clichés. It would have been easy to play this story primarily for laughs, rather than exploring Petey or Dewey with any sense of depth or emotional complexity.


Don Cheadle , Chiwetel Ejiofor and Martin Sheen in Focus Features' Talk to Me



What Lemmons attempts and successfully pulls off is to create a pair of complex characters who are as interesting as they are flawed. Ultimately, the film is as much about Dewey as it is about Petey and that's perfect for such a fine actor as Ejiofor, who has been steadily building an impressive list of supporting roles in films like "Children of Men", "Serenity", and "Inside Man". He holds his own opposite Cheadle, and as the story shifts to focus on Dewey's story, he easily carries the film. It's a wonderful opportunity for both actors to showcase talents that would be relegated to character roles in lesser films.

Other films "inspired by a true story" often fall short in that they come across as some sort of summary of a larger story, but here there is structure which gives the impression of being more complete. There is more emphasis on simply entertaining the audience, character development, and pushing a few emotional buttons then there is giving a history lesson. Still, I did feel educated cuz I knew nothing of Petey Greene, who not only served as a pioneer in the world of radio shock jocks, he also helped inner-city black America find its voice during the post-Civil Rights years. He's not the most respectable character but I give him credit for not becoming a sell-out and staying true to who he was. The film ends up bridging the gap between entertainment and social enlightenment while never falling back on the trappings that often plague films of this nature which can leave them either too heavy-handed or too light-hearted. I dunno if Oscar will remember this movie but I could easily see this on some Top Film lists at the end of the year simply due to the performances.




Special Features:

I didn't check out the two featurettes but I did do some homework on them. The first is Who is Petey Greene? which has no inclusion of any actual Petey Greene footage nor is there any interviews with the real Dewey Hughes, and no participation by anyone other than the cast and crew. Lame. It's too bad they didn't include a short doc about Greene, and give viewers something unique and interesting. The other feature is Recreating P-Town is slightly more informative, but certainly no less pedestrian, as it explains how the costumes and the sets were designed. I did watch the deleted scenes (most of them were extended versions of existing scenes) which made me wonder why they were cut. For example, it woulda been nice to keep the minute or two trimmed from Martin Sheen's powerful moment following the murder of Martin Luther King. The same can be said for the two scenes that were completely omitted that help develop Petey's humanity as a character. It would have been really nice to have an audio commentary with Lemmons, Cheadle & Ejiofor for the entire film too.




The Skinny:


  • Back in 2000, there was a Petey Greene film in development with Martin Lawrence attached to star, now that woulda been a whole different take, I fear. Greene's biographer Lurma Rackley was to write the script but contract negotiations broke down.
  • Lemmons is married to actor Vondie Curtis-Hall who stars in the film. She cast him Eve's Bayou" and in the short-film that followed "Dr. Hugo". In turn, as director he also cast her in 1997's "Gridlock'd" and 2006's "Waist Deep".
  • Lemmons first name is pronounced "Casey"
  • filming for the movie took place in: DC, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, Penny's Gas Station in Rush Valley, Utah, Tooele County, Utah, Toronto, Canada, and the Washington Monument




Tuesday, November 13, 2007

REEL REVIEW: Rendition (2007) **1/2

Rendition (2007) poster



R for torture/violence and language.
2 hrs. & 2 min.


written by: Kelley Sane
produced by: Steve Gollin
directed by: Gavin Hood


2007 just might be the year of a cinematic political siege. With all the movies released this year about the war on Iraq, politics post-9/11 as well as the physical and psychological after effects, you'd think that movie studios are satisfying audience demand for such films. Unfortunately, for these films, the box office results are showing that's not the case. People are not flocking to movies like "A Mighty Heart", "The Kingdom" or "In the Valley of Elah" and it doesn't matter what critics say about them. They just aren't finding audience like a Tyler Perry movie or "The Game Plan" is. Maybe it's due to the incessant barrage of war and politics the media serve viewers and readers, that make them opt for films that will have more of an escapism feel.


Since I don't pay much attention to 24/7 news channels and only vaguely cover news blurbs about the war and the politics related to it, these kind of movies rouse my curiosity. I'd much rather see a dramatization of something that is either inspired or based on true events then be bludgeoned with media scare tactics and body counts. I'd rather know the human element of all this senseless violence and confusion instead of the typical pie charts and statistics that are given. So, these movies don't bother me as they do some. The problem is with these (at times) message movies is that they either tend to be a little heavy-handed or labeled liberal agitprop.


That's the dilemma here with Award-winning, South African film director Gavin Hood's new film "Rendition". It's a well-enough made film that at times does force some themes but it at least the topic is something I haven't seen focused on before, that being the case of "extraordinary renditions", in which the CIA has permission to extradite those thought to be involved in terrorism without needing any sort of warrant. This started under Clinton's reign and has supposedly gotten out-of-hand under Bush after 9/11. I don't proclaim to be a political expert but that's at least what I gathered from the film.


The film uses the similar storytelling method as Crash, Traffic and Syriana which includes a number of seemingly disparate stories converging to show how small a world it truly is. Much of the story centers around a suicide bombing in North Africa, a deadly blast might immediately draw comparisons to "The Kingdom", although that was based on actual events and is a much stronger film in the way it deals with how the U.S. government deals with terrorists. So, sure we've seen an exploding market before but is it really something we've become desensitized to?


Because of this, Egyptian chemist Anwar El-Ibrahami (Omar Metwally), mysteriously disappears when the CIA removes him from his flight home from a conference in Cape Town. After they conveniently remove him from the flight records, he is interrogated and prohibited a phone call home. They deport him back to North Africa (Egypt, it seems) where he's imprisoned, stripped naked and tortured since he's suspected of having collaborated with the terrorists responsible. Basically, the case against him revolves around some random phone calls made from the suspected terrorist to Anwar's cellphone. Of course, they use extreme measures in order to find out details about these calls and of course Anwar has no idea why the calls are traced to his cell.


Reese Witherspoon in New Line Cinema's Rendition
Meanwhile, his pregnant wife Isabella (Reese Witherspoon) and 6-year-old boy back at home in Chicago has no idea what happened to him.Isabella contacts Alan Smith (Peter Sarsgaard) an old friend (and possibly former flame) in Washington who works for a high-powered Senator Hawkins (Alan Arkin) who might be able to unlock the mystery behind Anwar's disappearance. Typically, they both are hesitant about damaging their own image and career by supporting someone potentially with roots to terrorists.

CIA analyst Douglas Freeman (Jake Gyllenhaal) was in a vehicle in the Egyptian market when it exploded and say his supervisor die next to him. He's now reported to Lee Mayer ca(J.K. Simmons) the dead guy's superior, who is reported to CIA Head, Corrine Whitman (Meryl Streep), she's the one who authorized Anwars' rendition. Freeman is ordered to supervise the "questioning" of Anwar by an Egyptian official named Abasi Fawal (Igal Naor). But, there's another concurrent story, involving Fawal's daughter, Fatima (Zineb Oukach), who is caught up in a forbidden love story with Khaild (Moa Khouas), a passionate young boy who has some deadly secrets. I found this story the most interesting for some reason. It just seemed like these two young people had no one to turn to, no one on their side and I kept on wondering where their desperate decisions would lead them.



Igal Naor in New Line Cinema's Rendition


There are valid reasons for a movie like this to exist. It's sobering to see how my government can justify torturing "suspects" under the justification of a post 9/11 world. I kept on wondering who the terrorist really is in this storyline and for that, maybe the film did succeed. Still, the script by Kelley Sane isn't particularly impressive or convincing, everything seems to fall into place. Hood has made a good-looking second film and at times it is downright terrifying but it does wind up being a little predictable and redundant.

Despite having a superstar cast who for the most part deliver the goods. The weakest being Witherspoon and Gyllenhaal, neither of which really feel like they're in the right movie Gyllenhaal just feels miscast as a CIA analyst, he looks way too young and spends much of the film brooding or overseeing the torture without saying much or doing anything significant. He just broods. Witherspoon also seems way too young for her role, and she overcompensates with over-dramatic hysterics. Sure, her role is a lil harder as she is relegated to playing the worried wife on the phone or sitting in CIA waiting rooms. Streep and Arkin come in and do the bang-up jobs that you'd expect and even Sarsgaard does a decent job. There's just nothing really riveting here from the "known" talent.

They're just not nearly as not nearly as convincing as their Mideast counterparts. The two young unknown actors who play the desperate young lovers really do standout the most in the film. Metwally as the captured Anwar, gives a heart-wrenching performance as the tortured family man who feels hopeless. Just as strong is Naor as the man doing the torturing. At first he comes across as a poor man's Dr. Evil, but once his family life is shown we see the layers of his character and maybe why he is as hard as he is.

The "surprise twist" ending that I won't give away explains the important part the young lovers play in the story, but by that point--over an hour and 45 minutes into the movie--it starts to create way too many questions and possible flaws in the film's temporal logic, and it does very little to make up for some of the bland storytelling leading up to it.I haven't seen Hood's Oscar-winning last movie "Tsotsi" but I've been meaning to. It too succeeded so well with the use of non-actors, it's surprising he didn't try to search out unknown American talent rather than going with big names who tend to derail the story.

I knew nothing of the term "rendition" before this movie. I always thought of it as a musical term. So, the movie succeeded in educating me but it did lose me after a while due to it's miscasting. Regardless, I'd hate to see this movie ignored due to it's subject matter but I understand if some may feel a little "message fatigue". Films have come a long way in capturing current events. It took forever to release movies that really dealt with Vietnam. Movies that weren't glossing any reality over or hiding behind whatever propaganda was being sold. I have no problem with movies covering current events, a good story told well still makes a good movie. These topics aren't "too soon" or controversial to me, but just a reflection of how we need to try and understand what's going on in the world today.







Peter Sarsgaard , director Gavin Hood and Meryl Streep on the set of New Line Cinema's Rendition




The Skinny:


  • The movie was filmed in Anaheim, California at the Anaheim Convention Center, Cape Town, South Africa, Los Angeles, California, Marrakech, Morocco, and Washington DC.
  • The technical advisor for the film was ex-CIA Robert Baer, whose 2003 expose See No Evil inspired 2005's Syriana. Baer was reportedly the basis for the character played by George Clooney, who won an Oscar for his performance.
  • Director Gavin Hood's next film project is the X-Men spin-off "Wolverine" with Hugh Jackman back in the role that made him famous. It may seem an odd choice and that's why Hood was recently asked why he chose it.
  • There's also a 2007 movie called "Extraordinary Rendition" directed by Jim Threapleton and starring Omar Berdouni and Andy Serkis. The film was premiered at the Locarno Film Festival, Switzerland on August 8, 2007 and at the Edinburgh Film Festival on August 21, 2007 but is still awaiting a full commercial release.
  • An article published in the December 5, 2005, Washington Post reported that the CIA's Inspector General was investigating what it calls erroneous renditions.The term appears to refer to cases in which innocent people were subjected to extraordinary rendition.
  • Khalid El-Masri is the most well-known person who is believed to have been subjected to the process of "extraordinary rendition," as a result of mistaken identity. Laid Saidi, an Algerian detained and tortured along with El-Masri, was apprehended apparently because of a taped telephone conversation in which the word tirat, meaning "tires" in Arabic, was mistaken for the word tairat, meaning "airplanes."



Tuesday, November 6, 2007

DVD REVIEW: When a Stranger Calls (1979) ***

When a Stranger Calls (1979) poster




Rated R
97 min.
written by: Steve Feke & Fred Walton
produced by: Doug Chapin, Steve Feke, Larry Kostroff, Barry Krost & Melvin Simon
directed by: Fed Walton


I've been trying to get around to catching up on some suspense thrillers from the late 70's/early 80's lately. Some of the films on my list were seldom seen while others were eventually deemed classics. This film came a year and a day after John Carpenter's "Halloween" and has a similar feel to that slasher classic minus the body count. I can only imagine that once "Halloween" made it big both the idea of a teenage female babysitter being terrorized by some psycho became a hit for writers and parents had a hard time finding babysitters. Although, this is around the time that hack and slash films became popular and this film is often considered a horror film, it is definitely far from it.

Director Fred Walton creates a taut, uncomfortable, suspense thriller that steers clear of any bloody butchery or anything else that would become horror conventions of the genre. There's no sex scenes, no body counts, and really don't see any killing period. No instead we get proof that what is alluded to, what is unseen yet described is often more frightening.
The first 30 minutes or so of the film delivers one of the most real, eerie build-ups I've ever seen.

A young woman named Jill Johnson (
Carol Kane) shows up at the home of a wealthy doctor and his wife to watch their kids for the evening as they go out for dinner and a movie. As they're on their way out, the mother tells her that the kids are asleep and they've just gotten over bad colds and were a bit problematic, but that they shouldn't be hard to deal with as long as they don't wake up. Jill gets comfortable, talks to her friend on the phone about a boy named Bobby that she's interested in, and everything seems to be going just fine until the phone starts ringing.

Yes, hence the film's title and you know it's coming but Jill doesn't. That's what makes it all work. Sure, this kinda scenario has been played out but only because of this movie, least that's what it feels like. This isn't Drew Barrymore in "Scream" paying homage to all the classic phone scares of the past, no this is Kane before Simka and before she yelled "Humperdink! At first she doesn't pay much mind to the calls as they're just hang ups. But when the mystery man on the other end asks her 'Did you check on the children?' and then calls back a few minutes later only to ask her the same thing, she starts to get concerned. She calls the cops and after some pleading they agree to trace the call for her, only to report back to her with the news that whoever is harassing her is doing so from inside the same house. She runs outside, the cops show up, and in addition to a terrified babysitter they find a madman covered in blood and the corpses of two dead children.




Carol Kane-When a Stranger Calls (1979)


Seven years later, the man who killed the children, Curt Duncan (Tony Beckley), wasn't imprisoned because he was found insane. Instead, he was locked away in a mental hospital where he was subjected to electroshock therapy and a strict regiment of pills. Whether or not that was good for him or if his brain was fried, he managed to escape the and makes his way back to the city he once called home where he finds a place among the homeless population of the town and becomes obsessed with Tracy (Colleen Dewhurst), a barfly he meets at some dive. He's awkward and creepy yet seems somewhat unassuming and harmless, he's no Hannibal Lector that's for sure. The intense scenes where he harasses is all the more nerve-racking cuz the woman is a tough barfly (as Dewhurst usually is), you fear for her cuz you know what she doesn't. That's the sign of a successful thriller.

Former Inspector Clifford (
Charles Durning) who was involved with the original case is now working on his own as a P.I. and when the parents of the children that Duncan murdered find out he's free, they hire him to catch him. With the help of some of his old friends in the department (one of whom is played by Ron O'Neal, that's right, Superfly) he sets out to stop Duncan permanently. That's right, portly Durning is determined to be an action hero as we see him chasing his psycho up and down city streets. Whoa, easy there Charles, you're no Joe Don Baker! Here's where the film goes from "a stranger calling" to a winded detective one step behind.

The character of Duncan is played with the right amount of uneasiness but Beckley also makes you feel for him a little too. He's unhinged in his head but he knows he doesn't have a place in society and can't seem to figure out any kind of social skills. You'd figure he'd be an easy man to catch cuz he's just wandering about but of course if that wasn't the case that wouldn't bring him back to Jill Johnson. Sure enough, we catch up to Jill who's now married (to a Mike Brady, circa afro-sportin' look-alike) with two children of her own. Kane still radiates the same terror when she finds out Duncan is back, even moreso knowing what this could possibly mean for her family.

From the film's introduction to the coda, Kane is great in the role. She looks innocent and naïve and is the perfect counterpart to the maniac on the other end of the line. As she gets scared, so do we. While a lot of people are familiar with her from her more popular comedic roles, she had actually done a good amount of dramas even before this. She's delivers the serious tone of this film and her unusual speaking voice just adds to her character's naïve qualities.

While I do think it's a great thriller that should at least be seen once, the movie is not without it's flaws. There are a couple of moments where you wonder why the characters are doing what they're doing, particularly when Tracy opens her apartment door after Clifford pounds on it like a lunatic. Anyone with half a brain would be locking the deadbolt and calling the cops if someone came to their door and behaved that way. Also, even in the late 70's, it would seem odd that someone could escape from a mental hospital but then again Michael Myers did and so did Randal P. McMurphy. But really, a double child murderer? Wouldn't there even be any evening news coverage or public outcry? And how does Duncan find Jill again and for that matter why did he pick on her to begin with? Thankfully the movie gets more than enough right that we're able to overlook the logic gaps and enjoy the bigger picture for what it is – a tense and well made thriller that relies not on cheap effects or jump scares but on purely psychological suspense and effectively build tension.





WASCDVD


Special Features:

Move along, nothing to see here. It looks like the DVD was just slapped with a new label, likely in hopes of cashing in on the 2006 remake.



The Skinny:
  • Walton has remained a minor director who has frequently dabbled within the psycho-thriller genre. Fred Walton’s other films of interest are:– the slasher film April Fool’s Day (1986), the excellent Catholic psycho-thriller The Rosary Murders (1987) and the radio talkback host psycho-thriller Dead Air (1994). Walton then went onto make a whole host of genre tv movies, including a remake of I Saw What You Did (1988), another psycho-thriller Trapped (1989), Homewrecker (1992) about a rogue AI, and The Stepford Husbands (1996).
  • Walton returned to make a TV movie sequel When a Stranger Calls Back (1993), along with Kane and Durning who were now investigators helping stalked babysitter Jill Schoelen. The film was later remade, along with a host of other 1970s/80s horror films, as When a Stranger Calls (2006) by director Simon West.
  • Filmed in Brentwood, Los Angeles and Sacramento, California.
    Originally planned as a sequel to Black Christmas (1974) when 'John Carpenter' 's film Halloween (1978), which had originally been planned as the sequel, became a stand-alone film in its own right. This movie enjoyed the same "promotion" and Black Christmas remained without a sequel.
  • The movie was heavily based on the urban legend, "The Babysitter and the Man Upstairs".
  • Number 28 on Bravo Channel's 100 Scariest Movie Moments.
  • This would be Tony Beckley's last film. He would die from cancer a year later.
  • The concept of a killer calling another telephone in the same house is a durable urban legend, and is also used in the films Black Christmas and Scream.
  • Although the movie is fictional, there was an incident happened similar to the plot once shown on a TLC special where a man keeps calling the babysitter as she is downstairs reading a magazine while the boy is in bed. The man called at least 5 times, then the Police, however unlike the movie, the, Police came immediatelly, the boy wasn't murdered but a sock was tied to his mouth, and the Police caught the man. The man said his last words slurred.





Here's a hilarious lil promo for the movie



The climax to the first part of "When a Stranger Calls" makes you

scared of Charles Durning instead of what Carol Kane is scared of!

Thursday, November 1, 2007

REEL REVIEW: The Host (2007) ***1/2

The Host (2007) Korean poster)


R (for creature violence and language)
119 min.
written by: Bong Joon-Ho, Ha Jun-weon & Baek Cheol-hyeon
produced by: Choi Yong-bae
directed by: Bong Joon-Ho




I remember hearing about this movie before it's U.S. release earlier this year in March. All I knew is that it was some kinda monster movie from Asia. I immediately assumed it was another desperate hope for American cinema to re-release a little-seen horror classic from overseas and capitalize on the success of films like "The Ring" or "The Grudge". I had the idea that this was gonna be a silly Japanese monster B-movie. Once I started reading and hearing positive reviews about the film, I came to see my American naivete. The film is not Japanese at all, it takes place in Korea and the monster in the film wasn't toppling over skyscrapers like child's play. Instead, it's a man-made, mutated fish creature the size of a truck that emerges out of the Han River, terrorizing anyone in it's path.

The DVD cover is mistaken as it advertises, "On a par with Jaws", a quote that shows American marketing has no clue how to spin the movie. How can anyone compare it to a movie where the terrorizing great white shark is scarcely shown? That's not what's happening here, this movie is unique in that it shows the slimy, grotesque, somewhat comical-looking aquatic creature from the start. Right away we see this thing clumsily stampeding it's way through civilians along the river. No, this is far from "Jaws" and unlike any monster I've seen before. It may seem clumsy with it's whipping tail bopping up and down but it has a speed and agility one would never imagine.

Indeed, this is a rare monster movie in that it lets you see the creature and then hides it away, letting the humans carry the story. It follows the Park family, forced together against both the monster and the government, to find their youngest member, Hyun-seo (
Ah-sung Ko), who was taken by the creature. Her dim-witted father Gang-du (Kang-ho Song) blames himself for her capture. He helps run the riverside snack-bar with his father, Hee-bong (Hie-bong Byeon), where the incident occured. His sister Nam-joo (Du-na Bae) is a national medalist archer who lacks confidence while his alcoholic brother, Nam-il (Hae-il Park) hasn't made much of himself since graduating from college. In their pursuit to find Gang-du's daughter, they run into various obstacles, as seemingly everyone they encounter does their best to prevent them from saving her.




song_kang_ho3



Just what is the deal with this creature? Well, I'm not really giving anything away by telling you that the film starts out with an American military pathologist (Scott Wilson) commanding a Korean assistant to dispose of over 100 formaldehyde bottles down the drain. Hmmmm, guess where that flows into? So, this monstrosity is born of U.S. pollution in Korea, boy, we sure ruin everything. Now that's about as unsubtle a statement as could be made about the world's take on of the United States, as it puts a foreign country in peril through no fault of its own, and when it can't solve the problem, it needs America to step in, take over and clean things up.

Thankfully, the majority of the film really doesn't obsess over politics, it prefers the dysfunctional Park family over any type of statement. The story focuses on how fake blonde Gang-Du, his siblings and their father as they battle each other and this creature. At times these characters act as naturally frenzied as anyone would in a situation where a city is quarantined (due to the government's fear that this creature is "hosting' some plague) yet they also act just plain silly. I dunno if that's just their character or that the film is going for some comedy to add levity to a dark and tense setting. It may seem like the focus may be a lil off at times, bouncing between Hyun-Seo's struggle for survival in the monster's lair and her family's efforts to save her, but it works and it's still an exciting and involving thriller.

I didn't really find the moments of comedy upstaging the more serious or eerie scenes at all. In fact, the humor and fear elements combined really add a believable tone. It seems to me pretty common to try an add humor to a really horrible and uncertain situation. With it's beautifully kinetic and artistic cinematography, I can see this becoming quite a cult film eventually, if it hasn't already. The final climatic battle between the family and the beast alone is pretty compelling and would be enough to warrant a spot in the film history books. But, that opening scene when we first see the creature is one of the most original, well-filmed monster attacks in recent history.

At first, the creature may look kind of silly and dorky, like a cross between a catfish and a puppy dog, any thoughts of it being "cute" will quickly be abolished once it bares its teeth and starts attacking. It really is an amazing piece of CGI, the creature has as much real weight and depth as any of the creatures in Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings." It might be surprising how such an odd-looking creature can be realized in such a realistic and life-like way but that makes it far more threatening than any stop motion or man-in-suit monster could ever be. That's what makes the terror so effective, especially in the scenes where Hyun-seo is trying to escape from the creature's lair in the sewers.

The sound design and score is noteworthy here as well as it complements the story successfully.
Byeong Woo-Lee's impeccable score adds just enough to bolster the tension in the movie. The movie looks as good or better than most Hollywood blockbusters, it wisely avoids most of the predictable clichés and plot twists that often ruin the best of them. Bong's monster movie is set in the real world where attacking giant monsters has its repercussions. I quickly realized it's not wise to get too attached to anyone here. While some of those decisions might not be so popular, they create a more believable story, even if it's just because the young girl is too busy trying to keep from being eaten by the monster to name it and treat it like a pet (standard tradition in many Japanese monster movies). Its these elements that should quickly dispel any easy comparisons, as "The Host" sets the really raises the level for any future movies in the genre.

It should be noted that the film is in Korean with English subtitles for all you who convulse at the idea of sitting thru a movie you have to read. As long as the movie is good, that kinda thing has no effect on me.

The film is filled with such a tremendous amount of heart and humor that it rises above its genre roots to be a truly unforgettable moviegoing experience. I found myself enamored by the film's characters and especially intrigued by its titular monster. Somehow it falls a bit short of a four star rating bu tI still highly recommend it. It takes the typical monster from below genre and really adds some unique layers, more than many films of any genre can say. This DVD looks and sounds great, which is a key for this film, while the two-disc set has every extra you could ask for the one disc rental that I watched was thoroughly suitable. It helps to be a fan of these kind of movies but here's a film that really can be seen by anyone, if anything it definetly makes you think twice about what you pour down a drain as well as how close you are to a river.



park_hae_il1




hostceboxart_160w



Special Features:


The copy I rented was the single-disc version of the film as the double-disc wasn't available for rental. The single disc did okay as far as features go. I didn't really have time for all of them but I couldn't really remember if it went into detail as to how the creature was made. The 2-disc version though has a slew of extra goodies.....

Disc One, starts out with an audio commentary by director Bong Joon-Ho, who is joined by film critic Tony Rayns, who covers Asian films extensively. Rayns acts as moderator for Joon-Ho, who thankfully delivers the commentary in English. Considering the complexity of the monster and the unique nature of the film, it only makes sense that Joon-Ho spends a good deal of time discussing the how and why of the special effects, along with info on the inspiration for both the film and the creature, and plenty of details about the production. Joon-Ho does an excellent job on the track, though Rayns' help is certainly part of why the track moves along so well.

The commentary is supplemented by Joon-Ho's "Reflections," of the director apologizing on-screen to actors and people he may have "wronged" in making the film. To say this is a unique extra is putting it lightly.

Also included on the first DVD are deleted scenes, (I think I saw these) which flesh out the affect of the monster's attack, but were appropriately removed from the final film. The best is the insight into how Joon-Ho planned to sculpt his story, with extra bits and pieces, instead of many full scenes or alternate takes. The cut monster scenes will likely be the most interesting to fans of the film though. They are joined by over four minutes of complete news clips, seen in the background (and occasionally foreground) of the film.

Disc Two kicks off with an eight-part documentary on the making of the film, which runs approximately an hour, and covers the film's storyboards, direction, production, set design, special effects and sound. If there's something you wanted to know about the movie, and it wasn't covered in Joon-Ho's commentary, it's probably in here, as the piece focuses in on most aspects of the production, with plenty of looks behind the curtain, at how everything came together. Or...

You can find it in "The Creature," another multi-part featurette, with seven parts totaling over 85 minutes, looking solely at the creation of the monster. Considering how much a part of the film's hype was the creature, it makes sense that the disc spends a lot of time covering it, and this featurette nails it, with tons of behind-the-scene footage and interviews, including a lot of material from the well-known Weta Workshop.

About 20 minutes of coverage of the crew is broken down into three categories: the staff, the production team and the visual effect supervisor. It's pretty obvious at this point that no stone is left unturned on this DVD, with the staff section being cute, as it's styled after a scene in the film. Another seven-part epic, looks at the cast, including the stars and extras, with casting videos, on-set footage and interviews with the cast presenting a full picture of the acting portion of the equation.

We're not done yet, as a gag reel, which features silly animation renderings and the cast goofing around, and a sentimental five-minute look back, titled "Saying Goodbye," are joined by Korean trailers for the film, wrapping up the extras.






The Skinny:

  • The event described in the beginning of Gwoemul is based on an actual event. In February 2000 at a US military facility located in the center of Seoul, a US military civilian employee named Mr. McFarland was ordered to dispose of formaldehyde by dumping it into the sewer system that led to the Han River despite the objection of a South Korean subordinate. The South Korean government attempted to prosecute Mr. McFarland in a South Korean court but the US military refused to hand over the custody of Mr. McFarland to the South Korean legal system. Later, a South Korean judge convicted Mr. McFarland in absentia. The Public was enraged at the South Korean government's inability to enforce its law on its own soil. In 2005, nearly five years after the original incident, Mr. McFarland was finally found guilty in a South Korean court in his presence. He never served the actual prison sentence, however. No sighting of a mutant creature has been reported in Han River -- yet.
  • The scene where Nam-il kicks Gang-du at the funeral ceremony was improvised.
  • The crew of "The Host" used metal barrels to make the splash effects whenever the monster would dive into the water.
  • Computer Graphics for the creature were done by Orphanage Inc.
  • The movie had the highest record for people who watched in South Korea, which had a population of 13,019,740. It means over 20% of the whole South Korean population watched the movie. Of course, there are people who watched it several times.
  • Director Joon-ho Bong and the designer of the creature nicknamed it Steve Buscemi, based on the actor's screen persona and the way he acted in the movie Fargo (1996).
    The director designed all the creature's movements. He compared it to directing an actor.
  • Joon-ho Bong was impressed with Scott Wilson after having seen him in, among other films, Monster (2003). He approached the actor by sending him a copy of the script and a DVD of his previous film, Memories of Murder (Salinui chueok (2003)). The actor later agreed to be in the film.
  • In the news montage that depicted public hysteria, the man following the shot of the Center for Disease Control is former Canadian deputy prime minister John Manley.
  • The film was shot on three bridges in South Korea: Dong-ho Bridge, Han-gang Bridge & Wonhyo Bridge.
  • While the budget was among the largest ever in a South Korean production, by international standards it was more modest. The director had to work around the budget-imposed restrictions, especially when it came to special effects. The creature itself was designed by Chin Wei-chen, the modeling was done by New Zealand-based Weta Workshop and the animatronics were by John Cox's creature Workshop. The CGI for the film was done by The Orphanage, which also did the CGI of "The Day After Tomorrow."
  • The monster was designed with some specific parameters in mind. The director's wishes were for it to look like an actual mutated fish-like creature, rather than have a more fantastical design. The monster also needed to be able to run and perform certain acrobatic movements during the film.
  • Some of the filming took place in the real sewers near the Han River, rather than on a set. The stars and crew were told they were being inoculated against tetanus by the medical officer, though the injections also included inoculation against blood-sucking tapeworms that inhabit the sewers. During filming, the crew had to deal with the effects of changes in weather and ambient temperature. This including the sewage water freezing in cold temperatures, so that it had to be broken up and melted; and during hot and windy periods, the water evaporated and the silt turned to dust, which blew around in the breeze and into the faces of the crew.
  • Because of its themes that can be seen as critical of the United States, the film was actually lauded by North Korean authorities, a rarity for a South Korean blockbuster film.
  • The Host premiered at the Cannes Film Festival on May 21, 2006 and was released nationally in South Korea on July 27, 2006. Having been heavily hyped and featuring one of the most popular leading actors in the country, Song Kang-ho, the film was released on a record number of screens and made the South Korean record books with its box office performance during its opening weekend. Its American release was March 9, 2007.
  • U.S. DVD was released on July 24, 2007 in both single disc and a two disc collector's edition in DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-Ray formats.
  • On June 19th, it was announced that a sequel was in progress for a 2008 release, with a different director. It is planned to have a budget of about 10.7 million.


Interview with director Bong Joon-Ho




The Host (2007) American poster

Moving Pictures

Loading...

About Me

My photo
Believer. Brother. Son. Nephew. Cousin. Friend. Husband. Father. Colleague. Student. Teacher. Illustrator. Actor. Director. Singer. Improviser. Listener. Observer. Passenger. Driver. Tourist. Traveller. Imaginative. Resilient.